Label-Efficient Deep Learning for ECG Delineation: A Multi-Dataset Benchmark against Widely Used Delineation Tools
arXiv 人工智能预印本(Atom) · 2026-10-06 15:32 发布 · 2026-10-07 10:09 采集 · Ki Hong Lee
基本信息
原始数据层(AI 与用户都不会覆盖这些字段)
❔ 待判断
技术进展
AI
状态:已分析
综合价值 3.8 / 5
- 来源
- arXiv 人工智能预印本(Atom)(arXiv · INTL)
- 发布时间
- 2026-10-06 15:32
- 采集时间
- 2026-10-07 10:09
- 语言
- en
- 地域置信度
- 20%
- 原始链接
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07885v1
- 内容指纹
- 4409bc74214b76e2d9d8437b4647d34afcb1d5fba914656d344d23d46d523304
AI 整理
分析于 2026-10-07 10:10(第 1 版,来源:offline)Electrocardiogram (ECG) delineation, the identification of waveform boundaries, is a foundational step that translates raw ECG signals into clinically interpretable measurements.
为什么值得关注:属于技术进展,可能扩散到其他领域
趋势标签: delineation learning deep ecg
我的价值判断与记录
系统判断的重要性与你的判断同时保存(§27),永不互相覆盖添加记录
还没有记录。阅读后写下你的评论、启发与后续行动 —— 这是系统最终真正积累的部分。
用户纠错
原始信息 + 用户意见 + 修正结果分别记录,便于审计;系统不会自动改原始数据原始内容
仅在合法且采集到正文时显示;否则请查看原文链接Electrocardiogram (ECG) delineation, the identification of waveform boundaries, is a foundational step that translates raw ECG signals into clinically interpretable measurements. Deep learning has advanced this task but remains dependent on costly expert annotations. Label-efficient strategies such as self-supervised pretraining and semi-supervised learning are expected to ease this burden, yet it remains unclear whether they yield reliable delineation and whether the deep models they produce outperform the delineation tools used in practice. We address this in two stages. First, comparing self-supervised objectives with supervised or semi-supervised fine-tuning across one internal and four external datasets, we find that pretraining helps but the objective matters, and that the value of semi-supervised fine-tuning depends on the pretraining objective. Second, we benchmark the selected deep learning model against widely used open-source (NeuroKit2, Prominence, ECGdeli) and commercial (CalECG) tools using three complementary metrics. The model ranks best on every metric and dataset, outperforming the strongest tool by a clear margin on the rhythm-diverse set (mIoU 71.3 vs. 54.8%; averaged point-wise sensitivity 92.6 vs. 76.4%), and degrades the least from sinus to arrhythmia. A rhythm-stratified and point-wise analysis further characterizes the distinctive behavior of each tool, yielding practical guidance for tool selection. These results provide systematic, multi-dataset evidence that self-supervised pretraining is effective for ECG delineation and enables a label-efficiently trained deep learning model to outperform widely used delineation tools by leveraging abundant unlabeled data. This supports adopting such models in diverse, real-world clinical settings.
事件演化
同一事件的后续报道、状态变化与版本记录
2026-10-06
首次出现
Label-Efficient Deep Learning for ECG Delineation: A Multi-Dataset Benchmark against Widely Used Delineation Tools
暂无后续版本记录。当你把该信息加入「跟踪」后,后续采集到的相关报道会归并到这里。