Can Agents Work for Everyone? Cross-User Reliability for Mobile GUI Agents in Personalized User Interfaces
arXiv 人工智能预印本(Atom) · 2026-10-06 16:38 发布 · 2026-10-07 10:09 采集 · Taesik Gong
基本信息
原始数据层(AI 与用户都不会覆盖这些字段)
❔ 待判断
其他重要信息
AI
状态:已分析
综合价值 3.7 / 5
- 来源
- arXiv 人工智能预印本(Atom)(arXiv · INTL)
- 发布时间
- 2026-10-06 16:38
- 采集时间
- 2026-10-07 10:09
- 语言
- en
- 地域置信度
- 20%
- 原始链接
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07972v1
- 内容指纹
- 6ab270c96e7db094270ef1aa71344d7fc003bb454eaab38e4f2dc1c6d9b1a108
AI 整理
分析于 2026-10-07 10:10(第 1 版,来源:offline)Mobile GUI agents increasingly operate on interfaces influenced by users' histories and preferences, but their reliability across different users remains underexplored.
为什么值得关注:内容与关注主题相关
趋势标签: AI across users reliability user-conditioned
我的价值判断与记录
系统判断的重要性与你的判断同时保存(§27),永不互相覆盖添加记录
还没有记录。阅读后写下你的评论、启发与后续行动 —— 这是系统最终真正积累的部分。
用户纠错
原始信息 + 用户意见 + 修正结果分别记录,便于审计;系统不会自动改原始数据原始内容
仅在合法且采集到正文时显示;否则请查看原文链接Mobile GUI agents increasingly operate on interfaces influenced by users' histories and preferences, but their reliability across different users remains underexplored. We introduce PAIR (Personalized Application-state Instantiation and Rendering), a pipeline for constructing user-conditioned application states that enables controlled evaluation of the same task across different users. We further introduce RePAIR (Reinforcement learning with Personalization-Aware Interaction Rewards), a training approach that learns from cross-user differences in subgoal outcomes to improve reliability across user-conditioned mobile environments. Across six agents, we find substantial variation in task success across users and consistently lower subgoal achievement in user-conditioned UI contexts (6.98 to 15.4 pp). This gap further increases for personal targets drawn from each user's own content (8.77 to 22.0 pp). Failures in these contexts frequently involve selecting another item instead of the intended target, particularly before target exposure. Finally, RePAIR improves user-conditioned SAR (+5.87 pp), all-success (+7.50 pp), and overall Task SR (+9.42 pp) over its supervised fine-tuning parent on unseen users, providing initial evidence that explicitly learning from cross-user variation can improve GUI-agent reliability.
事件演化
同一事件的后续报道、状态变化与版本记录
2026-10-06
首次出现
Can Agents Work for Everyone? Cross-User Reliability for Mobile GUI Agents in Personalized User Interfaces
暂无后续版本记录。当你把该信息加入「跟踪」后,后续采集到的相关报道会归并到这里。